Wild Life Trade: Animal populations falls by 62% where wildlife trade occurs
A major analysis of hundreds of species of animals has revealed the huge toll the world’s booming wildlife trade is taking on the natural world.
Without urgent action, the world is facing “rampant trade-induced declines” of mammals, birds and reptiles. In places where the wildlife trade is active, species have dropped by an average of 62 per cent, according to the study. While local trade is part of the problem, demand from further afield is having the biggest effect on populations of animals, the research found, with 75 per cent of species declines involving national and international trade.
Researcher have warned that measures designed to protect species are failing, noting significant declines “even where the harvesting for trade occurs in protected areas. The wildlife trade, a global industry estimated to be worth up to $20bn a year, includes regulated, legal trade alongside poorly regulated, illegal trade.
Sadly At least 100 million plants and animals are internationally trafficked each year across a vast array of species which in result are demonstrated by the collapse in African elephant numbers, which are estimated to have plummeted from 10 million in the early 20th century to just 415,000 now, because of demand for ivory and habitat loss.
The last Javan rhinoceros was killed for its horn in 2010, and pangolins have become the center of vast international trade across Asia and Africa.
But the research also noted how the economic role the wildlife trade plays can make it difficult to stop, and in some cases, could leave animals even more exposed to risks.
The researchers stated that the Local-scale trade for both food and income security supports an estimated 150 million rural households involved with the extraction or commercialization of bushmeat.
“Conversely, the national to international trade in pets, medicines and luxury meats often involves a small number of highly specialized parties extracting and trafficking species of high commercial value. At all scales, trade has the potential to support livelihoods and even protect species from extinction, with sustainable trade potentially as lucrative as unsustainable methods.
“But at its worst, intensive extraction and trade is a prominent driver of extinction risk and a global threat to species.”
University of Sheffield – A research research team led by scientists examined records of traded wildlife, including both legal and illegal trade, comparing them with sites where species were not traded.
They stated that – they have uncovered several alarming patterns in the geographic coverage and taxonomic representation of studies using robust methods to characterize abundance responses to trade.
Later the scientists stated that – they have found population declines tracked species threat status, which means the more at risk animals were according to the IUCN red list, the more pronounced the fall in numbers.
Researchers have advised to Improve management, tackling both unsustainable demand and trade reporting, must be a conservation priority to prevent rampant trade-induced declines
It is also revealed that the breadth of the threat wildlife trade poses to biodiversity, one that the researchers said requires closer attention. While other factors such as habitat loss, hunting and the climate crisis are well understood threats, the obscure and imprecise knowledge of the effects of legal and illegal wildlife trade requires much closer further research.
Although the scale of the wildlife trade is immense and our evidence-based analyses show striking declines in abundances, understanding of species-level impacts lags behind our knowledge of other key threats to biodiversity, including deforestation, forest degradation and overhunting. This underlines an urgent need for a diversification of trade studies across taxa, biogeographic realms and purposes.
Lets save the wildlife and put a ban on wildlife trade!!!
Wild Life Trade
Adopt, Do Not Shop